๐ซ๐ท ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐บ๐ธ ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ.
- Antoine Sauvageot
- May 29
- 1 min read
In France, negotiation is typically:ย
Direct, structured, to the point
Open disagreement is normal (even expected)ย
Challenging ideas helps build credibility and trust
In the U.S., the approach feels different:ย
Relationship-building comes firstย
The tone stays positive, even when the topics are toughย
Disagreement is more diplomatic, but things move faster
๐ฌ I still remember one of my first negotiations in the U.S.ย
I challenged a supplierโs pricing logic openly, directly, backed by solid data. Exactly how I wouldโve done in France.ย
But I brought it up too soon.
๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐.
The energy shifted. The conversation slowed.ย
๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ. ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ค๐ง๐๐ฐ ๐ข๐ญ.
โก๏ธ Same message. Different impact.
That moment changed how I negotiate.
I learned that negotiation isnโt just about facts or tactics: ๐ข๐ญโ๐ฌ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ.ย ย And trust looks different in every culture.
Today, I blend both:
The French rigor that keeps the process sharp.
The American energy that keeps the relationship strong.
๐ฏ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ก ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐จ๐ซ + ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ง ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ = ๐๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ
How do you adapt your style across cultures?

Comments