๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ค ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ ๐ค๐๐ฒ๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐.
- Antoine Sauvageot

- May 20
- 1 min read
It was how honest the conversations became once procurement leaders started talking peer-to-peer.
Behind almost every discussion around AI was a much more operational question: How do we transform faster while already operating lean?
Tariffs.
Geopolitical uncertainty.
Fuel surcharges.
Supplier resilience.
Execution pressure.
Different industries. Very similar tensions.
What I appreciated most was the ability to exchange openly with leaders navigating many of the same realities, while also building connections with potential future partners ahead of upcoming RFPs and strategic initiatives.
One question Joe Theismann (former NFL MVP, Super Bowl champion, and entrepreneur) particularly stayed with me:
โ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ?โ
A good reminder that long-term differentiation, whether in sports, leadership, or procurement transformation, rarely comes without resilience, discipline, and adaptability.
In a business environment where procurement is expected to move faster, absorb more complexity, and contribute far beyond savings alone, conversations like these matter more than ever.
Thank you to Marcus Evans and everyone who contributed to the discussions throughout the week.












Comments